As Mauritius nears another general election, the political landscape is filled with promises of economic relief from the government. Recently, the Prime Minister announced a 14th-month bonus, reductions in VAT for several essential items and the introduction of 0% loans for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). While these measures may seem appealing on the surface, they raise important questions about the reality faced by many Mauritians and the true motivations behind these announcements.
For years, countless citizens have struggled to maintain a decent standard of living amid rising costs and stagnant wages. The timing of such generous promises, coinciding with the election cycle, has led many to wonder whether they are genuine efforts to improve lives or merely political manoeuvres aimed at securing votes. The prospect of a substantial financial boost in December is enticing but what good is a 14th month bonus if it merely serves as a temporary fix, leaving families to grapple with the same financial challenges throughout the rest of the year?
Moreover, we must consider the capacity of the private sector to support these initiatives. Many businesses, particularly smaller enterprises, are grappling with their own financial constraints and may not be able to provide a 14th month bonus to their employees, regardless of government incentives. This disconnect raises an essential question: how can Mauritians sustain themselves in the long run if the very foundations of their employment are unstable?
Furthermore, the familiar pattern of promises made only in the lead-up to elections is disheartening. It begs the question — why is it that significant relief measures surface only when ballots are on the horizon? Political leaders, regardless of their party affiliation, must prioritize the well-being of their constituents evenly and consistently, rather than as a reaction to impending elections. The act of making such promises can often expose the weaknesses and desperation of those in power, suggesting that they are willing to stoop to any level to secure their hold on authority. This dynamic encourages a culture of hypocrisy, where both politicians and the populace may exploit these situations for their gain.
In earlier days, political actions were often motivated by sincerity and a genuine desire to serve the community. However, the shift toward materialism in our political discourse has fostered an environment where outcomes are driven more by power and greed than by the common good. This, in turn, is depriving society of the moral compass that once guided our collective efforts, leading to a deeply entrenched cycle of self-interest and ethical erosion.
On the other hand, Ramgoolam appears to be treading carefully, potentially paralyzed by uncertainty about the government’s financial state. Instead of countering with grand promises, he seems reluctant to pledge initiatives without a clear picture of fiscal viability. This cautious approach further highlights the complexities of our current economic situation and underscores the necessity for transparency in government financial management.
Rather than resorting to what some may perceive as a culture of dependency, it is crucial that our leaders avoid fostering an environment where assistance is encouraged over hard work. We must instil in the new generation the value of effort and sacrifice; otherwise, they may never understand the true meaning of determination and perseverance. Policymakers should focus on creating sustainable jobs that provide equal opportunities for all Mauritians. It is not enough simply to provide monetary relief; we must equip our citizens with the tools and resources to thrive independently. The age-old adage rings true: “It’s better to teach someone how to fish than to give them a fish“. A society that encourages hard work, innovation and responsibility will foster resilience and growth, reducing the allure of emigration for those seeking better prospects elsewhere.
Moreover, we must address the glaring gaps in social policy. Announcements about financial support for individuals aged 0-18, those nearing retirement, and senior citizens are welcome, but neglecting the critical demographic of 30-50-year-olds risks deepening socioeconomic divides. This age group, often in the prime of their working lives, must not be overlooked. Policies should be inclusive, addressing the needs of all segments of the population.
As we stand on the brink of an election, it is vital for all Mauritians to demand accountability and vision from their leaders. Instead of accepting grand promises at face value, let us foster a culture of dialogue and engagement to ensure that the needs of our communities are genuinely met. Sustainable change requires more than just financial incentives — it calls for a commitment to building a society where every individual has the opportunity to contribute, thrive and secure a better future for themselves and their families.